Let's be realistic. We are in the midst of a war (not that one). A war between those who think they see someone with breasts enlarged testicles eating animals is a great entertainment and foam at the mouth when they see people taking a border mochaccino and reading the latest novel by Dan Brown. Is the culture war. Are you high or low? Except, wait a second. Traditional battle lines have been obscured by post-modern features that will see the most depressing garbage. However, as you must understand, ironically do with your tongue firmly in cheek. That's not fair, you are well on one side or the other! The letters V proletarians. V The scholar ignorant. Or in short words, the V with smart dumb. Right? So why the clever allowing themselves to be led by the move? Or rather, why try be led by the fool while giggling behind her and showing off his own stupidity demo?
Some smart Alec comic piece set in David Mitchell Observer in artificial intelligence and sex with their own adequacy stunned, lamenting how someone like Mitchell is placed on the pedestal that should be reserved exclusively for the intelligentsia. And then this critic had the audacity to turn Stephen Fry, (Britain self-appointed and start being a little annoying instead of charming) national treasure and a stronghold of the chattering classes knowledgeable. Critic Mitchell was missing the point. Although the article perhaps lacked a coherent flow, David Mitchell, comedian, there is to dissect the most sensitive aspects of robotics and then add some witty anecdotes that only an estimated professor at the University of Whatshisface dryness around 1976-78 is fun while stroking their extravagant facial hair. It is there to serve his character Funny, that many readers will be familiar with, and provide a brief description of its purpose, while making the laughs on the road.
Thus that are people like Mitchell to join the war against the culture? He is a refreshing voice, not unlike the view, as he himself admitted, Mark Corrigan, the character he plays so well in the Channel 4 Peep Show. It's kind of decline and positive change in the rent-a-Celebs tasteless garbage that television and do not contribute nothing but white smiles and good fortune of being attractive to the opposite sex. A knowledge, young people (ISH) man with a head of age and a diverse set of interests, happily commentator on serious issues affecting culture while participating as a guest or host a variety of talk shows. QI, in particular organized by that Fry is no picnic popcorn despite its comedic value and cheerful approach to the depths of knowledge. Again, this is where the war in culture is confusing and the front of the convergence of high and low and evaluate your eyes and then proceed to go to dinner. McDonald's or a Michelin restaurant, it does not matter, now are essentially the same.
Mitchell, took the same millieu of comedians / writers / celebrities is that Heart / comedians / writers (Mitchell, Fry, Charlie Brooker, Jimmy Carr, etc.) you can enjoy pontificate on serious news, however, are adverse to the rare occurrence in reference to the last star television. The high brow and low brow no longer know if they want to crack on each other and revel in their own smug satisfaction, except on the assumption that no matter what they are or what they represent, there's an audience watching / reading / waiting on her slave. The war continues, but above all one big conspiracy theory that struggled on the front, while those in the corridors of power to invent new concepts to keep us entertained. Or at least to keep talking, no matter which side they are on. Low or high, there's no escaping the fact that we are all holed up in both camps, like it or not. Desperate, celebrities eating kangaroo sufficiency observers of culture, we are all destined to meet somewhere in between, like choosing a side and stay true increasingly difficult.
Cadalack Ron – Hollywood High @ Brown Bag Thursdays, Voodoo Lounge, NYC, 12/3/09
|
|
Hollywood Highbrow: From Entertainment to Art (Princeton Studies in Cultural Sociology) $28.28 Today’s moviegoers and critics generally consider some Hollywood products–even some blockbusters–to be legitimate works of art. But during the first half century of motion pictures very few Americans would have thought to call an American movie “art.” Up through the 1950s, American movies were regarded as a form of popular, even lower-class, entertainment. By the 1960s and 1970s, however, viewer… |
